Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
Should social media be banned for kids under 16?
- 3w ago3 weeks ago
- Report
Share
- R@ReedRead27 rep
Comments
- Trending
Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
Which spongebob character are you?
Quiz00
AskMakeNoLawIncluding online ads53
Polls31
Unpopular OpinionWant a deck or a garage on your own land? Gotta beg some office for a stamp first. Whole thing is jobs for beaurocrats and extra cost piled on regular people133
Unpopular OpinionStating the obvious140
Free SpeechA kid cusses out a teacher, throws a chair, or spends the period making everybody miserable and the first move is always trauma, diagnosis, more meetings. Sometimes the kid just has no rules at home and figured out we will not do anything either. Kids must have consequences. You can care about a kid and still send them out of the room or suspend them.101
Polls42
Free SpeechLibs are nonstop scrolling on onlyfans wasting energy yet they wanna ban gas. Go live in a shed in the woods with no tech for 2 years then we can talk.81
No. Parents should decide
Share
I get the impulse, but how do you enforce it without making everyone upload an ID? Some don't get an id til 18+, and if not, kids will still lie about their birthday. Instead ban the addictive design tricks.
Share
I'd rather see limits on endless scroll, autoplay, late night notifications and targeted ads to minors. Those rules would be easier to enforce than trying to verify every teenager's identity online. And to do that you basically need to verify every single persons identity.
Share
No blanket ban. For some isolated kids, online communities are one of the few places they can find people who understand them.
Share
No. Kids need gradual access not zero access to full internet mayhem on an arbitrary day.
Share
No imo, but maybe force social media to provide robust parent controls for kids
Share