Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
Should social media be banned for kids under 16?
- 2mo ago2 months ago
- Report
Share
- R@ReedRead41 rep
Comments
- Trending
Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
AskMakeNoLawCameras, keystrokes, location tracking, screenshots, etc. Where would you draw the line?167
Outta 10Rate women's attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. Must restrict voting to men. No trannies.
44 Followers
Marilyn Monroe in her prime, rate her looks
Outta 1045
Outta 10Rate women's attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. Must restrict voting to men. No trannies.
44 Followers
Rate Cornell 7 whore Lucy Craig (allegedly) out of 10
Outta 1075
Polls65
Free SpeechIf they don’t provide extremely precise proof of rape claims they should not be believed. They are emotional retards.64
Free SpeechEvery shooting they scream mental health and want to ban guns. But school is a gun free zone. Give every teacher a gun and a few classes and it never happens again. Everyone knows it which is why democrats don’t wanna do it.205
Polls75
AskMakeNoLawParts, repair manuals and security updates for anything still in normal use.103
No. Parents should decide
Share
I get the impulse, but how do you enforce it without making everyone upload an ID? Some don't get an id til 18+, and if not, kids will still lie about their birthday. Instead ban the addictive design tricks.
Share
I'd rather see limits on endless scroll, autoplay, late night notifications and targeted ads to minors. Those rules would be easier to enforce than trying to verify every teenager's identity online. And to do that you basically need to verify every single persons identity.
Share
No blanket ban. For some isolated kids, online communities are one of the few places they can find people who understand them.
Share
No. Kids need gradual access not zero access to full internet mayhem on an arbitrary day.
Share
No imo, but maybe force social media to provide robust parent controls for kids
Share