Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
Should social media be banned for kids under 16?
- 3w ago3 weeks ago
- Report
Share
- R@ReedRead27 rep
Comments
- Oldest
Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
"Pitbulls" are dangerous
Free SpeechPit bulls were responsible for 78% of all fatal dog attacks in 2025. 8% of dogs in the US are pit bulls. This post isn't about pit bulls.31
Polls40
AskMakeNoLawIncluding online ads53
Unpopular OpinionWant a deck or a garage on your own land? Gotta beg some office for a stamp first. Whole thing is jobs for beaurocrats and extra cost piled on regular people133
AskMakeNoLawTheir goal is to price gouge you. Restricting them could be the move.57
Polls10
Unpopular OpinionI've watched it play out in warehouses Ive worked at. Hire or promote for the checklist instead of who can actually move freight without wrecking stuff or getting hurt. Then everyone acts shocked when quality tanks and people quit or get hurt. Merit used to mean something141
Polls41
No imo, but maybe force social media to provide robust parent controls for kids
Share
No. Parents should decide
Share
I get the impulse, but how do you enforce it without making everyone upload an ID? Some don't get an id til 18+, and if not, kids will still lie about their birthday. Instead ban the addictive design tricks.
Share
I'd rather see limits on endless scroll, autoplay, late night notifications and targeted ads to minors. Those rules would be easier to enforce than trying to verify every teenager's identity online. And to do that you basically need to verify every single persons identity.
Share
No blanket ban. For some isolated kids, online communities are one of the few places they can find people who understand them.
Share
No. Kids need gradual access not zero access to full internet mayhem on an arbitrary day.
Share