Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
Should social media be banned for kids under 16?
- 5d ago5 days ago
- Report
Share
- R@ReedRead12 rep
Comments
- Oldest
Would you support a nationwide age limit, even if parents disagree?
AskMakeNoLawIncluding keystrokes, screenshots, messages, and time spent away from your computer.14
Unpopular OpinionPoor people are more likely to be obese. Imo Democrats' body positivity movement is just an attempt to get poor people's votes, but it's actually killing them. Democrats are profiting with votes off poor people's pain.80
Polls00
Unpopular OpinionStating the obvious30
Polls10
Outta 10Rate women's attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. Must restrict voting to men. No trannies.
40 Followers
How hot is Greta the communist?
Outta 1044
Unpopular OpinionDeadbeats show up late or half ass the job and still keep their spot cause the union backs them. Real hard workers end up carrying the load. Companies get stuck and prices skyrocket for everyday people. Fire the bums and things would run smoother.122
AskMakeNoLawWould this prevent reckless wars or make real emergencies harder to handle?121
No. Parents should decide
Share
No imo, but maybe force social media to provide robust parent controls for kids
Share
I get the impulse, but how do you enforce it without making everyone upload an ID? Some don't get an id til 18+, and if not, kids will still lie about their birthday. Instead ban the addictive design tricks.
Share
I'd rather see limits on endless scroll, autoplay, late night notifications and targeted ads to minors. Those rules would be easier to enforce than trying to verify every teenager's identity online. And to do that you basically need to verify every single persons identity.
Share
No blanket ban. For some isolated kids, online communities are one of the few places they can find people who understand them.
Share
No. Kids need gradual access not zero access to full internet mayhem on an arbitrary day.
Share