Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on mail voting restrictions ahead of midterms
Share
- N@nopanic30 rep
Comments
- Oldest
Trump calls Iran conflict 'small potatoes' and defends Vance's position that it's not a 'war'
Politics20
Trump agrees to new bipartisan ethics provision in massive crypto bill, Republican senators say
Politics113
Woke in the WildPictures, screenshots, and videos of racist and pro lgbt woke ideologies you encounter in day to day life.
42 Followers
LA public library lets trannies indoctrinate your kids
Woke in the Wild73
Trump celebrates US Winter Olympians and Paralympians at the White House
Politics79
Trump calls AI risks a 'hoax,' says there is a 'SICK conspiracy' against AI and data centers
Politics45
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
79 Followers
California judge puts MS-13 member wanted for murder back on the street
Conservative911
Kennedy Center board votes to close for renovations, against Trump's wishes
Politics20
Woke in the WildPictures, screenshots, and videos of racist and pro lgbt woke ideologies you encounter in day to day life.
42 Followers
ChatGPT says Prophet Muhammad was not a pedophile
Woke in the Wild00
making the post office check whether you're on a government voter list before it'll deliver your ballot is deeply fucked. you now also have to trust your post office worker doesn't vote for the other side
Share
They have no more info than they already had. If it was gonna happen it’s already happening since mail carriers generally know the political leanings of the neighborhood. Glad you agree it can’t be trusted and needs to be banned!
Share
Individual carriers aren't checking a voter database, dumbfuck.
Share
About 30% of ballots were cast by mail in 2024. You need to prove fraud before taking away voter rights from millions
Share
Mail voting is a method, not the right itself, dumbass
Share
In person is a method too. Doesn't mean the government can close half of them on a whim
Share
And the court didn't even find the order legal. It said the states challenged it too early.
Share
And now a federal judge has blocked it again for two weeks 🙄
https://apnews.com/article/15cf1ec7dcdb8211bf6b624b75a7f4ab
Share