Killing endangered wildlife is legal if they aren't the target, new Trump rule says
Share
@fe_PRIDE162 rep
Comments
- Newest
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Iran's new Supreme Leader says US's collapse has accelerated after Dems take control of Congress
Conservative57
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Trump deciding if he will renew strikes on Iran
Conservative65
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Paxton warns that if we lose Texas we lose America
ConservativeI agree with him. We would be on a very dark path if Talafreako wins248
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Iran deal framework emerging after diplomatic talks
ConservativeYou guys think this is real or just trying to get us more votes today?45
Republicans turn on Trump after losses
Politics84
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Democrats win House and Senate in blue wave
ConservativeTerrible night. Drank a lot. Sucks ass1911
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Gun owners knew a blue wave was coming
Conservative94
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
112 Followers
Trump Warns California Election Officials of Jail Time if They Let Noncitizens Vote
Conservative406
Bulldozer are gonna be killing endangered animals for fun now. Great
Share
Good. Build more shit. Gonna help the economy
Share
"Good. Build more shit. Ruin the world"
Share
Make the same rule for hunters please
Share
Youd use it to murder protected animals
Share
If they know they won't be punished, they won't take precautions to make sure it doesn't happen.
Share
Exactly
Share
The previous rule was excessive and restricted the economy
Share
Some restrictions are the point. If a company can destroy protected habitat we're worse off as a society.
Share
It's a balance but peta folk went way too far. Human progress is more important than some random animals
Share
You think this is a bad thing? Makes sense to me
Share
This means it's going to happen more often
Share