Killing endangered wildlife is legal if they aren't the target, new Trump rule says
Share
@fe_PRIDE81 rep
Comments
- Newest
Related Posts
Supreme Court declines Trump's appeal of $5 million E Jean Carroll award
Politics24
ConservativeFor social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
84 Followers
CNN reporting from the sidewalk after Trump kicks them outConservative56
Woke in the WildPictures, screenshots, and videos of racist and pro lgbt woke ideologies you encounter in day to day life.
43 Followers
You must be attracted to everyoneWoke in the Wild11- Conservative
For social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
84 Followers
New York bill erases 'mother' and 'father' from state lawConservativeThe bill swaps "mother" and "father" for "gestating parent" and "non-gestating parent." Democrats already passed it through both chambers.69 
Fake NewsNews stories, articles, documents, or social media posts related to the US that are based on lies or misunderstanding the truth, usually on purpose. Must be from news organizations or supposedly unbiased public figures.
48 Followers
AP says Republican might lose, cites one single Republican switching her voteFake News31- Conservative
For social and fiscal conservatives to discuss political and cultural issues and news.
84 Followers
Feds seize enough fentanyl to kill 8 millionConservative16kg of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine. Libs are furious. This is what federal enforcement should look like.1711 - Trump says his planned arch would become a 'military complex' able to host drones and snipersPolitics42
Trump signs order renaming Lake Ontario to Lake AmericaPolitics44
Bulldozer are gonna be killing endangered animals for fun now. Great
Share
Good. Build more shit. Gonna help the economy
Share
"Good. Build more shit. Ruin the world"
Share
Make the same rule for hunters please
Share
Youd use it to murder protected animals
Share
If they know they won't be punished, they won't take precautions to make sure it doesn't happen.
Share
The previous rule was excessive and restricted the economy
Share
Some restrictions are the point. If a company can destroy protected habitat we're worse off as a society.
Share
Exactly
Share
You think this is a bad thing? Makes sense to me
Share
This means it's going to happen more often
Share